As Published On
→ The Out-Lawyer’s
Blog: http://www.jaygaskill.com/blog1
And
The Policy Think Site: http://www.jaygaskill.com
All
contents, unless otherwise indicated are
Copyright ©
2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 by Jay B. Gaskill
Permission
to publish, distribute or print all or part of this article (except for
personal use) is needed. [Permission for use in group discussions is almost
always routinely given.]
Please
contact Jay B. Gaskill, attorney at law, via e mail at law@jaygaskill.com
SORRY
– YOU CAN’T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS…
I have recently speculated in conversation that the signature of the Nina Reiser killing (assuming here for argument’s sake that the husband did it) is more like a sudden quarrel, impulse murder/manslaughter, followed by an “On sh..!” series of quickly executed cover-up actions, than some long thought out sinister plot on the killer’s part. A number of comments, sympathetic to Hans have surfaced recently (one of which is appended to my last post by “Christopher”).
Here’s the deal: Christopher’s
second comment exposes the hidden “tragedy’ in this case (for those who care
about “perfect” justice). If you falsely claim that a killing didn't happen or
that you didn't do it, then - in the real world - you can't expect any measure
of mitigation due to "provocation" and so on. Defendants can't have
to both ways. Trust me,
I’ve been there with a defendant many, many times….
JBG